|
Bridging
the Human Resources Gap
Based
on a presentation by Carol Dominguez
Presented at e-Services Philippines 2006
February 17, 2006
The BPO Industry in the Philippines
It’s
encouraging to know that the e-Services sector acknowledges the
urgency of this issue. This goes beyond any one call center or
recruitment firm. What we’ll be talking about today will
benefit the entire country.
Everyone
has heard it all: the Philippines is Number Two when it comes
to the BPO market share, but that’s nothing to worry about.
There’s plenty of work to go around. It’s been said
over and over again that for the past year and a half. We are
on the cusp of greatness.
That’s
not my concern. My talk is about the gap.
Now,
what exactly is the gap?
Now,
it’s generally known that the Philippines has a high literacy
rate, that we are culturally in tune with the United States and
have no problem relating to Americans and most westerners. We
produce 400,000 plus college graduates; the NCR alone produces
almost 90,000 graduates per year.
What’s
more, the outer provinces are now being considered as possible
locations in which to set up call centers. At this time, 19 call
centers have already been set up in the provinces and more are
expected to come.
The
Supply Problem
The
next question now becomes, “How many of these graduates
are qualified?”
Right
now, only a few of them are. I can’t stress this point enough:
the HR gap is the most pressing issue facing the e-Services sector
today. We have plenty of demand, but our supply is running short.
To
illustrate, John Clements conducted a study last year, in the
CALABARZON region.
We
wanted to know the skill levels of our graduates, and tested approximately
2,500 graduating students from that region. They were tested as
regular call center applicants are tested: cognitive skills, oral
English proficiency, communicative skills, typing speed, spelling
and IT skills.
So
what were our findings?
First
of all, only 3 percent of them passed. Granted, they did well
in spelling and cognitive skills, but their oral proficiency and
typing were sorely lacking. In my opinion, typing is very easy
to improve, and train, for that matter. Language skills, on the
other hand, take a lot more effort. I’d also like to note
that the 3% who passed were mostly students from the De La Salle
University in Dasmariñas. Without their scores, the acceptance
rate would only be .81% for the rest of the CALABARZON.
Let
me repeat that: less than 1% are qualified for a call center interview.
What
we discovered is something that happens at John Clements on a
daily basis. Our average hit rate is 6 percent.
Here’s
an example: let’s say that within a year, 49,652 candidates—possibly
half of the 90,000 graduates from the NCR—get a call from
us, asking them to come in and be screened. Of these 49,652 candidates,
40% of them show up. That’s 19,860 candidates.
These
candidates are first screened for oral proficiency. Only 50% of
them will pass: that amounts to 9,930 candidates. Then, out of
those who passed, only 11% will be successfully placed in call
centers. This adds up to 1092 candidates hired out of almost 50,000
candidates.
We
did a little better in 2005, where our average hit rate was 6
percent. That translates to around 1,000 successful placements
out of 20,000 applicants. It’s still not a pretty picture.
Assessment
Methodologies
The
John Clements Oral Assessment Scale
Now,
how exactly do we test our candidates for oral proficiency? Let
me discuss the seven-point scale we use at John Clements.
This
is our oral proficiency scale at John Clements. It rates nine
aspects of oral proficiency on a scale of one to seven, with seven
being a near-native speaker.
Our
oral proficiency screeners listen to their accent, meaning pronunciation
and intonation, to ascertain whether their accents get in the
way of comprehension.
Fluency
is just that: a candidate’s ability to speak in a flowing
manner, without the use of fillers, like “umm,” or
“ah,” and the ability to speak without hesitation.
We
also measure a candidate’s ability to initiate and sustain
conversations, which is very important in the customer service
industry; this includes volunteering information, elaborating,
and keeping the discourse flowing. Sometimes, even the most accurate
and fluent speakers of English disappoint the call center interviewer
by answering their questions with a one-sentence answer and then
sitting quietly. Call center work involves Question-Answer-Comment-Question-Comment-Answer:
in other words, a back-and-forth, give-and-take interaction.
Pronoun
and letter confusion is actually two things. Pronoun confusion
involves confusing gendered pronouns like using “she”
for masculine subjects and vice-versa. Letter confusion arises
when people confuse certain letter sounds, like /p/ and /f/, /s/
and /z/, and /v/ and /b/.
Comprehension
tests if a candidate has an ear for the language, and can easily
understand English when used in conversation.
Naturally,
we measure a candidate’s grammar, and test for subject-verb
agreement, tense consistency, and sentence structure, among other
things.
Prepositions
are the most challenging aspect of learning a language, and we
also test the proper usage of these terms.
Vocabulary
is always a plus, but more often than not, our screeners just
take note of the usage of more complex terms, the same with the
last aspect, the use of idiomatic language.
The
beauty of this system is that we can test for oral proficiency
in English within 15 minutes. Our trained oral proficiency screeners
can immediately spot if a candidate is a good speaker.
What
John Clements looks for is a minimum score of 5+ on this scale,
which indicates a candidate is trainable.
BPA/P
Human Resources Committee Initiative
The
issue of supplying the demand for competent BPO workers is nothing
new, at least where the Business Process Association of the Philippines
is concerned. In response to the demands of the industry, the
BPA/P formed an HR committee initiative to create an industry-approved
standard for assessing BPO employees, and an industry-standardized
baseline agent training program. The member companies of this
committee are John Clements Consultants, Teledevelopment Services,
Viventis, FuturePerfect, and Asia Partnership.
We’ve
compared experiences using our own assessment tools and we are
in the process of creating an industry-wide standard for the BPO
industry. We also hope to provide the industry with more competent
workers through our training programs and eventually develop that
one human resources standard by which all screening methods will
be measured.
Partnering
for Workforce Development
It
only makes sense that we train qualified trainers as an immediate
solution to the hiring crunch, so they can train more competent
candidates who can fill the demand in the BPO industry.
With
this in mind, John Clements has also recently partnered with the
Technical Education and Skills Development Authority, or TESDA
to help train people and provide the industry with a steady supply
of qualified workers to the BPO industry. As a government institution,
TESDA’s role is that of an enabler, and in fulfilling this
role, TESDA has acknowledged the viability of training people
for the BPO industry. In December 2005, a batch of TESDA trainers
concluded their training seminar in the CALABARZON area under
our English consultant, Rocky Peltzman, and soon they will be
joining the ranks of yet more trainers who will ensure that there
will not be a shortage of qualified BPO workers.
Training
Call Center and BPO Near-Hires and English Teachers
John
Clements also has a few offerings for both near-hires to the BPO
industry and college, high school, and elementary teachers of
English. For near-hires, we’ve been offering 100-hour courses
to college graduates who’ve scored 5 in our 7-point assessment
scale, as we believe these candidates are easily trainable in
oral proficiency and communication skills, and will eventually
make excellent call center workers. Our Polishing English course
is available for these candidates, and once their English proficiency
score has been raised to a level high enough for them to pursue
a call-center career, we’ll endorse them to our clients
for the final interview.
The
Polishing English course aims to help candidates speak more fluently
and accurately, with confidence and to understand native speakers
of English. Candidates are also taught to write a professional
resumé, and are taught to role-play job interviews with
self-assurance.
Right
now, John Clements has just finished training six batches of near-hires
in Laguna and Batangas, and around 118 candidates have already
been endorsed to clients for their final interviews.
We
also offer training programs in small-group communication methodology
for English teachers from state colleges and universities from
all levels to encourage them to pursue careers in training people
for the BPO industry. These teachers can also echo-train their
peers in this methodology, thereby increasing the number of English
teachers.
The
aim of this methodology is to increase student-talking time and
decrease teacher-talking time. By encouraging students to talk
in class, they can better practice their conversational skills.
Through
Small-group Communicative activities, teachers learn to impart
the basics of pronunciation, fluency and accuracy, American idiomatic
expressions, listening comprehension and email communication.
Changing
the Curriculum and the Issues Involved
It’s
clear by now that there’s no way the demand for competent
call center workers can be met without making significant changes
to the curriculum our schools use, and changing that curriculum
has its own issues.
First
of all, who shall we train? This one’s obvious: we have
to train teachers, so they can replicate themselves by training
more teachers. So far, the teachers we’ve trained have been
excited about using the new methodologies in their respective
classes.
Secondly,
will the teachers be able to implement the methodology in large
classrooms? Small-group Communicative Methodology works best in
small classes of around 15 students. This will be harder to implement
with larger classes. We recommend tapping student teachers assisting
veteran teachers in class so they can practice their use of the
methodology. Points can also be given to students who speak English
consistently in class. As a last resort, there a small fine could
be levied for any non-English word spoken; the money collected
can be used for a snack at the last day of class.
Thirdly,
shall we train other teachers as well? We need to tread softly
here, as a lot of deans have admitted that more than half their
faculty have a hard time speaking English fluently. It’s
best to broach the topic cautiously so as not to step on any toes.
Fourthly,
how shall oral assessment of teachers outside the English department
be done? It’s always best to arrange classes with the participants
from the same level. As always, extreme courtesy is advised in
these proceedings.
Fifth,
if these teachers are trained, what will be required of them in
their classrooms afterwards? Will they be required to teach ONLY
in English? Will they be required to accept only English answers
from their students? And will they be required to correct their
students’ English in the classroom, in real time?
Sixth,
how will students in non-English subjects accept being corrected
in front of their peers? All language teachers know that the preferred
order of correction is self-correction, then peer correction and
only as a last resort, teacher correction. But if the student
doesn’t realize he or she has made an error, and the friend
sitting next to them doesn’t whisper the correction, will
the lecturer be required to correct the student on the spot?
Lastly,
will the school impose a “Speak English Only” policy
on campus—because what good will it be to raise the level
of spoken English if students are allowed to speak local languages
on campus? Should there be Speak Only English Zones, like the
library, cafeteria, computer lab, or what? If we can assume that
most students speak local languages at home, on public transportation,
in shops and at religious services, do we have the right to demand
they speak only English within the walls of the campus?
English
Is Cool
This
is a project headed by the European Chamber of Commerce of the
Philippines that also aims to address the emergency concerning
English proficiency.
Its
short-term goals involve training 250,000 candidates to reach
call center level within five years and to bring the next million
candidates to a trainable level, basically expanding the pool
of trainable people.
The
mid-term goals are more geared toward addressing the issue from
the end of trainers and professionals. The program aims to encourage
and improve the use of English among professionals in the service
industries and in management positions. Around 50,000 students
will be enrolled in fast-track classes to get the ball rolling.
Once
the needed momentum is reached, the foundation will have been
laid for the project’s long-term plans. At this level, changes
will be wrought on the level of basic education, ensuring that
more and more students will graduate speaking English with fluency
and competency.
Conclusion
In
closing, I’d like to repeat something I’ve said time
and time again. We are have a national emergency on our hands.
True, we have benefited from the BPO industry’s flourishing
in our country, and we’ve managed to tap into our national
affinity for the English language. But I’m afraid that might
be where it all ends, because right now, we’re all tapped
out. A lot of the competent speakers of English have already found
jobs in call centers, but the need for more competent speakers
is still there. We need to fill that gap, and for now, the best
way to address that gap is through training. We need to train
near-hires and make them good enough to get hired. We need to
train trainers so they can pass their expertise on to more people
who can, in turn, train others.
We’re
on the cusp of greatness here; we just need the strength of will
to do what needs to be done. The key to our success is still the
same: training, training, training.
|